Home

2025

Understanding Model Interpretability

Cover Image

In the era of artificial intelligence and machine learning, understanding how models make decisions has become crucial for ensuring transparency and trust. Model interpretability techniques like Partial Dependence Plots (PDP), Individual Conditional Expectation (ICE), Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME), and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) provide powerful tools to peek inside the black box of complex algorithms.

The pursuit of transparent artificial intelligence has never been more critical. As organizations deploy increasingly sophisticated algorithms across high-stakes domains, the demand for model interpretability has transcended academic curiosity to become a regulatory and ethical imperative. Understanding how models make decisions is no longer optional—it's essential for building trust, ensuring fairness, and maintaining accountability in our AI-driven world.

Model interpretability addresses the fundamental challenge of making black box systems comprehensible to human stakeholders. When a loan application is denied, a medical diagnosis is suggested, or a hiring decision is influenced by algorithmic recommendations, affected parties deserve meaningful explanations. This transparency serves multiple constituencies: end-users seeking justification for decisions that impact their lives, practitioners needing to debug and improve model performance, and regulators ensuring compliance with emerging AI governance frameworks.

The interpretability landscape encompasses diverse methodological approaches, each with distinct strengths and limitations. Partial Dependence Plots reveal how individual features influence predictions across the entire dataset, while LIME provides localized explanations by approximating complex models with simpler, interpretable surrogates around specific instances. SHAP leverages game theory to assign fair attribution scores to features, and Individual Conditional Expectation curves show how feature changes affect individual predictions, complementing the averaged perspectives of PDPs.

These techniques operate along a spectrum from global interpretability—understanding overall model behavior—to local interpretability—explaining specific predictions. The choice of method depends critically on context: regulatory compliance often demands consistent, theoretically grounded approaches like SHAP, while rapid prototyping might favor faster but less robust techniques like LIME. Success requires matching interpretability tools to specific stakeholder needs, model types, and deployment constraints while acknowledging that no single approach provides complete transparency into complex algorithmic decision-making.

Partial Dependence Plots (PDP)

Based on the previous chapter's discussion of model interpretability importance, Partial Dependence Plots (PDPs) emerge as a fundamental technique for understanding how individual features influence model predictions. PDPs visualize the marginal effect of one or more features by averaging the model's predictions across all possible values of other features, effectively isolating the relationship between the target feature and the predicted outcome.

The methodology involves creating a grid of values for the feature of interest, then systematically replacing that feature's value in every data point while keeping other features unchanged. The model's predictions are then averaged for each grid value, revealing how changes in the feature affect predictions on average. This approach makes PDPs model-agnostic, working equally well with tree-based models, neural networks, or any black-box algorithm.

However, PDPs carry a critical assumption: feature independence. When features are correlated—a common occurrence in real-world data—PDPs can generate misleading visualizations by forcing the model to evaluate unrealistic feature combinations. For instance, a PDP might show predictions for "zero income with luxury spending," combinations that never occur naturally. This limitation becomes particularly problematic in domains like healthcare or finance where feature correlations are strong and interpretability errors have serious consequences.

Modern practitioners increasingly supplement PDPs with Accumulated Local Effects (ALE) plots for correlated features and uncertainty quantification techniques to provide confidence intervals around PDP estimates, addressing the statistical reliability concerns that have emerged in recent research.

Individual Conditional Expectation (ICE)

While Partial Dependence Plots reveal average feature effects, Individual Conditional Expectation (ICE) plots expose the heterogeneous relationships hidden beneath these averages. Unlike PDPs that aggregate predictions across all instances, ICE plots show how each individual data point responds as a single feature varies, creating multiple overlapping curves rather than one averaged line.

The mathematical foundation builds directly upon PDP methodology. For each observation i and feature xj, ICE computes f(xj, xc(i)) across a grid of xj values while holding all other features xc constant at their original values for that instance. This generates individual prediction trajectories that reveal subgroup behaviors PDPs might obscure through averaging.

ICE plots excel at detecting feature interactions and heterogeneous effects. When PDP shows a flat line suggesting no relationship, ICE often reveals opposing trends—some instances increasing while others decrease—that cancel out in the average. This capability proves invaluable for identifying bias patterns, understanding model fairness across demographic groups, or debugging unexpected predictions for specific cases.

Implementation requires generating multiple synthetic versions of each data point with only the target feature modified, then plotting all resulting prediction curves. Centered ICE plots enhance interpretability by subtracting each curve's starting value, focusing attention on relative changes rather than absolute prediction levels. While computationally similar to PDP construction, ICE visualization can become cluttered with large datasets, typically requiring sampling or aggregation techniques for practical deployment.

Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME)

While ICE plots reveal how individual instances respond to feature changes, Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) takes a fundamentally different approach to understanding model predictions. Instead of examining feature variations globally, LIME explains why a model made a specific prediction for a particular instance by creating locally faithful approximations using interpretable models.

LIME operates through strategic perturbation around the instance of interest. For tabular data, it samples from feature distributions while maintaining realistic value ranges. For text, it systematically removes words to observe prediction changes. For images, it masks superpixel regions to identify influential visual components. These perturbations generate a neighborhood dataset that LIME weights by proximity to the original instance.

The technique then trains an interpretable model—typically sparse linear regression—on this weighted neighborhood data. The resulting coefficients reveal which features contribute positively or negatively to the specific prediction. This local approximation provides intuitive explanations: highlighted words in sentiment analysis, influential image regions in computer vision, or critical feature thresholds in tabular predictions.

LIME's model-agnostic nature makes it particularly valuable for debugging individual predictions and building stakeholder trust. Unlike ICE plots that show feature-prediction relationships across the dataset, LIME answers "Why did the model classify this specific email as spam?" by identifying the exact words or patterns that influenced that decision, making it indispensable for explaining high-stakes individual predictions in healthcare, finance, and legal applications.

SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations)

While LIME operates on local neighborhoods, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) provides a unified theoretical framework rooted in cooperative game theory. Unlike approximation-based methods, SHAP guarantees mathematically consistent explanations by treating each feature as a "player" and the prediction as a cooperative "payout." This framework satisfies three critical properties: local accuracy (feature attributions sum to the difference between prediction and baseline), consistency (features with increased contributions never receive decreased attribution), and missingness (unused features receive zero attribution). TreeSHAP enables efficient computation for tree-based models, while KernelSHAP provides model-agnostic explanations. SHAP's visualizations—including force plots, summary plots, and dependence plots—offer both local and global interpretability insights, making it particularly valuable for high-stakes applications requiring regulatory compliance and stakeholder trust in machine learning decisions.

Conclusions

Model interpretability techniques provide essential insights into complex machine learning systems, each offering unique perspectives and advantages. While PDPs and ICE plots excel at visualizing feature impacts, LIME and SHAP provide detailed local explanations. Together, these tools enable practitioners to build more transparent, trustworthy, and effective AI systems.

Aug

Model Training: Revolutionizing AI Applications in Banking and Finance

Cover Image

Model Training: Transforming AI in Banking and Finance Operations

Estimated reading time: 7 minutes

Key Takeaways

  • Model Training Defined: It's the process of teaching AI systems to make accurate decisions or predictions using large sets of data.
  • Importance Highlighted: Mastering model training enables financial institutions to execute complex tasks seamlessly.
  • Key Concepts Preview: This blog will explore Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF), Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), and the role of Search & Agents in enhancing AI Data Management.

Introduction

Model Training is revolutionizing the way AI is applied in banking and finance operations. By harnessing the power of AI, financial institutions are achieving unprecedented levels of efficiency and service quality. Understanding and implementing advanced model training techniques is crucial for fully leveraging AI's potential in banking and finance operations.
  • Model Training Defined: It's the process of teaching AI systems to make accurate decisions or predictions using large sets of data.
  • Importance Highlighted: Mastering model training enables financial institutions to execute complex tasks seamlessly.
  • Key Concepts Preview: This blog will explore Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF), Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), and the role of Search & Agents in enhancing AI Data Management.

Section 1: Overview of AI in Banking and Finance Operations

  • Define AI in the Financial Context: AI simulates human intelligence in machines, enabling them to learn, reason, and correct themselves.
  • Transformation Through AI:
    • Operational Efficiency: AI automates routine tasks, reduces errors, and accelerates processes.
    • Enhanced Customer Experience: AI enables personalization and quick responses to customer queries.
    • Accurate Decision-Making: AI analyzes massive datasets for precise decision-making.
  • Specific Applications:
    • Fraud Detection: AI scrutinizes transaction patterns to spot fraud.
    • Risk Assessment: Utilizes machine learning for creditworthiness evaluations and market risk predictions.
    • Personalized Services: Offers customized financial advice and products.
    • Process Automation: Facilitates data entry and compliance checks in back-office operations.
  • Research Findings: AI in banking is predicted to save the industry around $1 trillion by 2030. Source URL

Section 2: Understanding Model Training

  • Model Training Defined: It involves adjusting an AI model's parameters through data exposure, enabling pattern recognition and decision-making.
  • Importance in Finance: Effective training equips AI with the ability to manage complex financial operations efficiently.
  • Applications in Banking and Finance:
    • Analyzing Financial Data: Models detect trends and anomalies.
    • Predicting Market Trends: AI forecasts stock prices and market behavior.
    • Automating Decision-Making: Handles credit approvals and investment choices.
  • Emphasize: "Model Training" is integral to optimizing financial systems.

Section 3: Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)

  • SFT Defined: Fine-tunes pre-trained AI models using labeled data specific to tasks.
  • How SFT Works: It tailors a general model for specific tasks with relevant datasets.
  • Role in Finance:
    • Credit Scoring Models: Fine-tuning to assess creditworthiness.
    • Fraud Detection Systems: Enhanced using known fraudulent and legitimate data.
    • Customer Segmentation: Models tailored for targeted marketing.
  • Benefits:
    • Gains accuracy and task relevance.
    • Reduces time and resources compared to building from scratch.
  • Research Findings: SFT enhances AI capabilities in banking. Source URL

Section 4: Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF)

  • RLHF Defined: Marries machine learning with human input for improved AI performance.
  • How RLHF Works: Involves AI learning from a feedback loop that includes human guidance.
  • Applications in Finance:
    • Trading Algorithms: AI evolves trading strategies with expert feedback.
    • Customer Service Chatbots: Adapt interactions based on feedback.
    • Risk Assessment Models: Leverages human expertise for precise predictions.
  • Benefits:
    • Merges human intelligence with AI.
    • Adapts effectively to financial challenges.
  • Research Findings: RLHF showcases significant success in banking AI applications. Source URL

Section 5: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)

  • RAG Defined: Integrates information retrieval with text generation for precise results.
  • How RAG Works: AI retrieves pertinent data during content generation.
  • Utility in Banking:
    • Financial Reports: Generates comprehensive reports with real-time data.
    • Customer Queries: Provides precise answers using updated info.
    • Regulatory Compliance: Aids compliance via relevant data retrievals.
  • Benefits: Generates accurate, timely outputs by using current information.
  • Research Findings: RAG significantly boosts customer satisfaction in finance. Source URL https://editingdestiny.duckdns.org/retrieval-augmented-generation-ai-revolution

Section 6: Search & Agents in AI Data Management

  • Search Algorithms and AI Agents Defined:
    • Search Algorithms: Locate specific data swiftly.
    • AI Agents: Autonomous programs that perceive and act within environments.
  • Functions in Data Management: Ensure efficient data handling and decision automation.
  • Applications in Finance:
    • Portfolio Management: AI adjusts investments using real-time data.
    • Real-Time Analysis: Monitors markets for trends using search and analysis.
    • Automated Trading: Executes trades based on strategic algorithms.
  • Benefits: Enhances responsiveness and operational efficiency in data handling.
  • Research Findings: Demonstrates enhanced trading efficiency through AI agents. Source URL

Section 7: Challenges and Considerations in AI Data Management

  • Data Privacy and Security:
    • Issues: Threats like data breaches.
    • Solutions: Employ encryption and stringent access measures.
  • Regulatory Compliance:
    • Issues: Compliance with laws like GDPR.
    • Solutions: Integrate compliance checks within AI operations.
  • Ethical Considerations:
    • Issues: Avoiding biased AI decisions.
    • Solutions: Implement ethical frameworks and audits.
  • Potential Biases in AI Models:
    • Issues: Skewed decisions due to biased data.
    • Solutions: Use diverse datasets and employ model audits.
  • Research Findings: Emphasizes the role of ethics in AI deployment in financial services. Source URL

Section 8: The Future of AI in Banking and Finance

  • Upcoming Trends:
    • Generative AI for Personalized Advice: Custom financial planning through AI.
    • Advanced Risk Management: Real-time AI-based monitoring.
    • Sophisticated Trading Systems: AI employed in high-frequency trading.
  • Advancements in Model Training: Innovations in self-supervised and transfer learning methods.
  • Staying Ahead: Importance of embracing AI advancements for staying competitive.
  • Research Findings: Forecasts AI's transformative impact on banking. Source URL

Conclusion

  • Recap Importance of Model Training: Highlight the transformative impact of SFT, RLHF, and RAG on financial operations.
  • Emphasize Understanding: Grasping these cutting-edge technologies is imperative for maximizing AI potential.
  • Encourage Adaptation: Urge financial industries to keep abreast of AI advancements.
  • Balance Innovation and Responsibility: Stress the importance of embracing innovation while addressing challenges responsibly.
Understanding and implementing model training is pivotal in unlocking AI's potential in the banking and finance sector. Embracing advanced AI data management strategies, while balancing innovation with ethical responsibility, will be crucial for staying competitive in the industry.
Mar

Defining Fidelity Risk in AI Document Processing

As organizations increasingly rely on artificial intelligence for document processing and data extraction, the concept of fidelity risk has become paramount. This risk encompasses the potential discrepancies between source documents and AI-generated outputs, including issues like hallucinations, semantic drift, and information misrepresentation. Understanding and managing these risks is crucial for maintaining data integrity and ensuring reliable information extraction.

Defining Fidelity Risk in AI Document Processing

Fidelity risk in AI document processing represents a fundamental challenge where automated systems fail to maintain accurate correspondence between source documents and extracted information. This risk manifests across multiple dimensions, from basic data extraction errors to complex semantic drift that undermines information integrity. The core manifestation of fidelity risk emerges through Named Entity Recognition failures, where AI systems struggle with ambiguous references, domain-specific terminology, and contextual disambiguation. These failures compound when processing diverse document formats, creating cascading effects throughout downstream applications. Document summarization amplifies fidelity concerns through compression artifacts and selective omission of critical details. AI models frequently introduce subtle distortions during abstraction, where paraphrasing alters meaning or eliminates nuanced context essential for accurate interpretation. Knowledge graph construction represents perhaps the most complex fidelity challenge, requiring accurate entity extraction, relationship mapping, and semantic consistency across interconnected data points. Errors propagate through graph structures, creating systemic data misrepresentation that affects analytical outcomes. The business implications of AI fidelity failures extend beyond technical accuracy to encompass regulatory compliance, operational reliability, and decision-making integrity. Organizations must establish comprehensive validation frameworks that combine automated quality metrics with human oversight, particularly for high-stakes applications where fidelity errors carry significant consequences.

AI Hallucinations and Information Integrity

When AI hallucinations occur in document processing, they represent a critical threat to information integrity, where AI systems generate plausible but factually incorrect outputs that were never present in the source documents. Unlike traditional processing errors, hallucinations create fabricated entities, relationships, or numerical values that appear authentic but fundamentally compromise the trustworthiness of extracted data. This phenomenon becomes particularly dangerous in financial document processing, where research indicates that 68% of extraction errors stem from hallucinated numerical values, while 32% involve incorrect entity relationships. The implications extend beyond isolated inaccuracies to systematic data misrepresentation that can cascade through business operations. When AI systems fill gaps in ambiguous documents with invented information, or when pattern completion mechanisms override actual content, the resulting outputs maintain apparent coherence while being fundamentally unreliable. These integrity violations become especially problematic in knowledge graph construction, where hallucinated entities can create false connections that persist and propagate errors throughout interconnected data structures. Mitigation requires grounding techniques such as retrieval-augmented generation, which constrains AI outputs to explicitly documented information, combined with post-processing validation that cross-checks extracted data against source documents. Provenance tracking and cryptographic protections further ensure that any alterations to processed information remain detectable, maintaining an auditable chain of data transformation that preserves accountability in AI-powered extraction workflows.

Semantic Drift and Knowledge Graph Accuracy

Beyond the immediate issue of hallucinations lies a more subtle but equally critical challenge: semantic drift within document processing workflows. Unlike outright fabrications, semantic drift represents the gradual erosion of meaning as information traverses multiple processing stages, from initial extraction through knowledge graph integration. Semantic drift manifests when AI systems progressively alter conceptual relationships during data transformation, compression, or summarization processes. In named entity recognition tasks, this drift occurs when contextual clues become disconnected from their original semantic anchors, causing entities to lose their precise meaning or acquire unintended associations. The phenomenon is particularly pronounced in multi-step processing pipelines where each transformation introduces subtle distortions that compound over time. Knowledge graphs serve as both a solution and a potential amplifier of drift. While they provide structured semantic relationships that can detect and prevent meaning degradation through contextual validation, they also create new vectors for semantic instability when entity relationships are incorrectly updated or when conflicting information sources introduce inconsistencies. Effective drift management requires implementing information integrity monitoring through cosine similarity thresholds and relationship validation protocols that maintain semantic coherence across processing stages. The challenge intensifies when dealing with evolving document corpora where new terminology and relationships continuously emerge. Organizations must balance system adaptability with semantic stability, ensuring that data fidelity remains intact while allowing for legitimate conceptual evolution in their knowledge bases.

Measuring and Monitoring Data Extraction Accuracy

Building on the semantic challenges addressed in the previous chapter, establishing robust measurement and monitoring systems becomes critical for maintaining data extraction accuracy in AI document processing workflows. Effective accuracy monitoring requires implementing comprehensive metrics that capture both the quality and completeness of extracted information. Precision, recall, and F1 score form the cornerstone of extraction accuracy measurement, particularly for structured data extraction scenarios. Precision metrics evaluate the proportion of correctly extracted fields against all extracted fields, while recall measures the completeness of extraction by comparing correctly identified fields to all relevant fields present in source documents. The F1 score provides a balanced assessment, offering a single metric that harmonizes both precision and recall considerations. Beyond traditional accuracy metrics, monitoring systems must incorporate field-level accuracy tracking and word error rate (WER) measurements to capture granular performance variations across different document types and extraction tasks. Real-time confidence scoring enables dynamic quality assessment, allowing systems to flag potentially problematic extractions for human review before they propagate through downstream processes. Continuous monitoring frameworks should establish baseline accuracy thresholds tailored to specific use cases and document categories. Iterative evaluation protocols using varied prompts and document samples help identify accuracy drift patterns, enabling proactive adjustments to extraction models before fidelity degradation compromises operational integrity. This systematic approach to accuracy measurement creates the foundation for implementing the risk mitigation strategies explored in the following chapter.

Risk Mitigation Strategies and Best Practices

Building on established monitoring frameworks, implementing comprehensive risk mitigation strategies requires multi-layered validation protocols and proactive quality controls. Effective strategies begin with robust input preprocessing, where documents undergo standardization and format validation before entering AI pipelines, significantly reducing downstream AI hallucinations and extraction errors. Critical mitigation approaches include implementing retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) frameworks that ground model outputs in verified source documents, preventing semantic drift during processing. Confidence scoring mechanisms flag low-certainty extractions for human review, while automated cross-validation compares outputs against known ground truth datasets. For data extraction workflows, establishing validation checkpoints at each processing stage ensures data quality integrity through boundary checks, completeness verification, and format consistency testing. Information integrity protection requires combining extractive document summarization with named entity recognition pipelines that feed validated entities into knowledge graphs for relationship verification. Human-in-the-loop oversight provides final validation for high-stakes documents, while continuous monitoring dashboards track extraction accuracy trends, enabling proactive intervention when fidelity degradation occurs. This comprehensive approach maintains document processing reliability while preserving semantic accuracy across diverse document types and formats.

Conclusions

Managing fidelity risk in AI-powered document processing requires a multi-faceted approach combining technical solutions with robust validation processes. As AI systems continue to evolve, organizations must remain vigilant in monitoring and maintaining data accuracy while implementing appropriate safeguards to ensure reliable information extraction and processing.
Aug

AI is Transforming Banking and Finance: Use Cases and Trends

Cover Image
```html

AI is Transforming Banking and Finance: Use Cases and Trends

Estimated reading time: 6 minutes

Key Takeaways

  • AI is rapidly being adopted in banking to enhance efficiency, security, and customer experience.
  • Cost reduction is a major driver, with potential savings of up to 60% in risk and compliance.
  • Personalization is a key goal, moving banks toward customer-centric models.
  • AI-powered fraud detection identifies suspicious activities in real-time.
  • Chatbots offer 24/7 customer support and improve operational efficiency.
  • AI enhances credit scoring by analyzing alternative data for more inclusive lending.

AI is no longer a futuristic concept in banking and finance; it’s a present-day reality reshaping the industry. This blog post explores the current trends, key use cases, and future implications of artificial intelligence in the financial sector.

The Rise of AI in Financial Services

Banks and financial institutions are aggressively adopting AI to stay competitive and meet rising client expectations – source: [https://www.ey.com/en_gr/insights/financial-services/how-artificial-intelligence-is-reshaping-the-financial-services-industry](https://www.ey.com/en_gr/insights/financial-services/how-artificial-intelligence-is-reshaping-the-financial-services-industry) – source: [https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/banking/top-10-trends-banking-2025](https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/banking/top-10-trends-banking-2025) – source: [https://reports.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Financial_Services_2025.pdf](https://reports.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Financial_Services_2025.pdf).

Cost reduction is a vital driver, as AI automation can slash operational expenses—such as risk and compliance checks—by up to 60% in coming years – source: [https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/banking/top-10-trends-banking-2025](https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/banking/top-10-trends-banking-2025) – source: [https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/banking/top-10-trends-banking-2025] – source: [https://reports.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Financial_Services_2025.pdf](https://reports.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Financial_Services_2025.pdf).

Stricter regulatory compliance needs prompt automated checks, elevated accuracy, and reduced false positives.

The demand for personalized banking experiences is pushing banks to shift from product-centric to customer-centric models using AI—delivering tailored advice, custom product bundles, and relevant services to each client – source: [https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/banking/top-10-trends-banking-2025](https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/banking/top-10-trends-banking-2025) – source: [https://reports.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Financial_Services_2025.pdf](https://reports.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Financial_Services_2025.pdf).

Keywords: how AI is transforming financial services, machine learning in banking

Key AI Use Cases in Banking

AI-Powered Fraud Detection & Risk Management

AI-driven fraud detection enables banks to identify suspicious activities and fraudulent transactions in real time by analyzing vast volumes of payment and behavioral data – source: [https://reports.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Financial_Services_2025.pdf](https://reports.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Financial_Services_2025.pdf).

Machine learning algorithms spot unusual patterns, learn from new fraud schemes, and improve over time, enhancing both fraud protection and the customer experience by reducing false positives – source: [https://reports.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Financial_Services_2025.pdf](https://reports.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Financial_Services_2025.pdf).

AI is also vital for risk management, enabling more precise risk scoring and better underwriting decisions across the financial sector – source: [https://reports.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Financial_Services_2025.pdf](https://reports.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Financial_Services_2025.pdf).

Personalized Customer Service with Chatbots

AI-powered chatbots and virtual assistants offer 24/7 support, handling everything from balance inquiries to complex product advice – source: [https://www.ey.com/en_gr/insights/financial-services/how-artificial-intelligence-is-reshaping-the-financial-services-industry](https://www.ey.com/en_gr/insights/financial-services/how-artificial-intelligence-is-reshaping-the-financial-services-industry) – source: [https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/banking/top-10-trends-banking-2025](https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/banking/top-10-trends-banking-2025) – source: [https://www.posh.ai/blog/future-banking-trends-to-watch-in-2025](https://www.posh.ai/blog/future-banking-trends-to-watch-in-2025).

Examples like Bank of America’s Erica and Capital One’s Eno set the standard for always-available, context-aware service.

These systems boost operational efficiency and satisfaction by providing instant, reliable answers, freeing human agents to handle higher-value interactions – source: [https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/banking/top-10-trends-banking-2025](https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/banking/top-10-trends-banking-2025) – source: [https://www

Jul

AI Evaluation: Best Practices for Testing and Assessing Generative AI Tools

Description of the image

AI Evaluation: Best Practices for Testing and Evaluating Gen AI Tools

Estimated reading time: 10 minutes

Key Takeaways

    • Understanding the importance of AI Evaluation in ensuring effective and safe Gen AI tools.
    • Exploring key evaluation metrics and performance measurement strategies.
    • Identifying challenges in Gen AI evaluation and proposing solutions.
    • Learning from real-world applications and case studies.
  • Anticipating future trends in Gen AI evaluation.

Introduction

Generative AI tools, often referred to as Gen AI, are dramatically reshaping various industries, from content creation to healthcare. These systems are capable of generating new content, such as text, images, and code. However, their effectiveness and reliability are deeply contingent on thorough AI Evaluation. This blog post delves into the best practices for testing and evaluating Gen AI tools to ensure they are effective, relevant, and safe, using appropriate Gen AI Evaluation metrics and performance measurements.

Understanding Gen AI Evaluation

What Is Generative AI?

Gen AI systems are capable of creating new content rather than merely analyzing old data. These systems find applications in diverse areas, such as:

    • Text Generation: Improving chatbots and aiding content creators.
    • Image Generation: Assisting in design and art creation.

Evaluation is essential for ensuring that Gen AI tools produce high-quality and relevant outputs. Proper evaluation reveals both the strengths and the potential biases of these models.

Setting the Ground for Evaluation Metrics

The Role of Evaluation Metrics

Evaluation metrics serve as objective standards to assess AI model effectiveness. They are crucial for understanding how a Gen AI tool performs over multiple dimensions.

Types of Evaluation Metrics

    1. Quality Metrics:
        • Coherence: Evaluates logical consistency of generated content.
      • Relevance: Assesses how closely the output aligns with the given input or context.
    1. Safety Metrics:
        • Toxicity: Detects any harmful or offensive content.
  1. Performance Metrics:
      • Response Time: Measures how swiftly a model can generate outputs.
    • Resource Utilization: Evaluates the computational resources utilized by the model, impacting scalability.

Key Gen AI Evaluation Metrics

Generation Quality Metrics

    • ROUGE (Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation): This metric measures the quality of machine-generated summaries or translations by comparing them to human references [14].
    • Perplexity: Used for language models, this metric measures how well a probability model predicts a sample. Lower values indicate better performance. Source: Addaxis AI.
  • BLEU (Bilingual Evaluation Understudy): Commonly used for text translations, BLEU compares machine-generated to human-written references. Source: Addaxis AI.

Safety and Responsibility Metrics

    • Toxicity: Evaluates the presence of harmful content to prevent the spread of inappropriate information.

Performance Metrics

    • Response Time: Evaluates the model’s speed, crucial for user satisfaction.

Performance Measurement Strategies

Best Practices for Measuring Gen AI Performance

1. Automated Evaluation

Tools such as Azure AI Foundry facilitate automated and scalable assessments of Gen AI models. This approach ensures efficiency and consistency. Source: Google Cloud.

2. Human-in-the-Loop Evaluation

Combining automated metrics with human insights captures subtleties such as creativity or contextual relevance. Source: DataStax.

3. Benchmarking Against Industry Standards

Comparing Gen AI tools against industry benchmarks helps identify areas for enhancement and competitive differentiation. Source: DataForce. AI in Banking and Finance: Revolutionizing the Financial Sector

4. Continuous Monitoring

Consistent monitoring helps detect and manage performance degradation over time. [13]

Challenges in Gen AI Evaluation

Common Challenges

    1. Subjectivity in Quality Assessment: Elements like creativity or relevance are hard to measure objectively.
    1. Data Limitations: Securing diverse datasets for evaluation is challenging.
    1. Evolving Standards: Rapid advancements in Gen AI technology require continual updates in evaluation criteria.
  1. Potential Biases: AI models may inherit biases from their training data.

Solutions

    • Blend qualitative and quantitative assessments.
    • Regularly refresh and diversify datasets.
  • Keep up with industry updates and best practices.

Tools and Techniques for Effective Evaluation

Common Tools for AI Evaluation

Azure AI Foundry

Offers both automated metrics and human-in-the-loop assessments, covering a comprehensive evaluation spectrum. Source: Google Cloud.

FMEval

Provides a set of standardized metrics for assessing quality and responsibility in language models. [17]

OpenAI's Evaluation Framework

This framework provides diverse metrics to assess the quality, coherence, and relevance of AI outputs. Source: Addaxis AI.

Case Studies and Real-World Applications

Walmart: A Success in AI-Powered Inventory Management

Walmart implemented AI tools for inventory management, enhancing efficiency by 97% due to rigorous evaluation. Customizing evaluation metrics to align with operational goals was key. Source: Psico-Smart.

Mount Sinai Health System: Healthcare Innovation with Gen AI

By reducing hospital readmission rates by 20% through AI evaluation, Mount Sinai showcased the necessity of robust assessment in healthcare. The focus on data quality and ethics were lesson highlights. Source: Psico-Smart.

Lessons Learned

Tailored evaluation leads to better outcomes; continuous assessment results in notable performance improvements.

Future of Gen AI Evaluation

AI-Powered Evaluation

Using advanced AI models for Gen AI evaluation enhances scalability and provides context-aware assessments. Source: DataStax.

Ethical AI Evaluation

There is growing emphasis on the ethical impact of Gen AI tools, aligning outputs with societal and regulatory standards. [16] The Transformative Role of AI in Financial Compliance: Enhancing Risk Management and Fraud Prevention

Adaptive Evaluation Frameworks

Frameworks that adapt to new AI capabilities future-proof evaluation strategies. [11]

Evaluation methods must evolve with AI advancements. Continuous education and collaboration with industry bodies are essential.

Conclusion

Effective AI Evaluation is fundamental to maximizing the benefits of Gen AI tools. It ensures reliability, mitigates risks, and enhances user trust. Continuous learning and adaptation to evolving industry standards are crucial for sustained success.

Investing in comprehensive evaluation not only yields competitive advantages but also improves performance outcomes.

Call to Action

We invite you to share your experiences, challenges, or questions about Gen AI evaluation in the comments. For extended learning on Gen AI Evaluation metrics and performance measurement, explore resources from industry leaders like NIST. [16] Generative AI and the Future of Work in America: Transforming Jobs, Productivity, and Skills

Through diligent evaluation practices, your organization can harness the full potential of Gen AI tools.

Mar

Retrieval Augmented Generation: Transforming AI with Real-Time Knowledge Integration

Cover Image

Retrieval Augmented Generation: The Game-Changing AI Technology Revolutionizing Language Models



Estimated reading time: 8 minutes



Key Takeaways



  • Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances language models by incorporating external knowledge retrieval.


  • RAG addresses critical limitations of traditional AI models like outdated information and lack of domain specificity.


  • By combining retrieval and generative models, RAG provides accurate, current, and context-specific responses.


  • RAG has diverse applications across industries, transforming sectors like healthcare, legal, and finance.


  • Organizations adopting RAG can expect improved accuracy, transparency, and cost-effective AI solutions.




Understanding Retrieval Augmented Generation



Retrieval Augmented Generation represents a significant leap forward in AI technology, enhancing the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by incorporating external knowledge retrieval. According to AWS, this technique effectively bridges the gap between traditional language models and real-world information needs. Rather than relying solely on pre-trained knowledge, RAG enables AI systems to access and utilize current, relevant data from external sources.



Why RAG Matters: Addressing Critical AI Limitations



Traditional language models, despite their impressive capabilities, face several significant limitations that RAG aims to overcome. The Weka.io learning guide highlights four primary challenges that RAG addresses:



  1. The "Frozen in Time" Problem
    Traditional LLMs operate with static knowledge from their training data, making them unable to access current information. RAG solves this by allowing real-time access to updated information sources.


  2. Limited Domain Knowledge
    Standard language models lack specialized knowledge for specific industries or companies. RAG enables the integration of domain-specific information, making AI systems more valuable for specialized applications. For example, integrating insights from AI in Banking and Finance: Revolutionizing the Financial Sector can enhance financial AI applications.


  3. The Black Box Issue
    Understanding how AI systems reach their conclusions has been a persistent challenge. RAG provides transparency by clearly identifying information sources.


  4. AI Hallucinations
    According to SuperAnnotate, one of the most significant challenges with traditional LLMs is their tendency to generate plausible but incorrect information. RAG significantly reduces this risk by grounding responses in verified external sources.


The Inner Workings of RAG



The RAG process operates through a sophisticated four-step approach:



  1. Indexing Phase
    The system begins by processing and indexing unstructured data from various sources, creating a searchable knowledge base.


  2. Retrieval Process
    When a query is received, the system searches for and retrieves relevant information from the indexed data.


  3. Augmentation Stage
    The system combines the retrieved information with the original query, creating a context-rich input.


  4. Generation Step
    Finally, the language model generates a response based on both the query and the retrieved information.


Essential Components and Their Roles



According to AWS, RAG systems rely on three crucial components:



  1. The Retriever
    This component acts as the system's librarian, efficiently searching and retrieving relevant documents and facts from various knowledge sources.


  2. The Language Model
    A sophisticated pre-trained model that processes the combined information to generate coherent and contextually appropriate responses.


  3. The Vector Database
    This advanced storage system maintains documents as embeddings in high-dimensional space, enabling quick and efficient information retrieval.


The Impressive Benefits of RAG Implementation



The advantages of implementing RAG are substantial and measurable:



  • 43% Improvement in Accuracy
    Studies have shown that RAG-based responses demonstrate significantly higher accuracy compared to traditional fine-tuning approaches.


  • Real-time Information Access
    RAG systems can access and utilize current information without requiring costly and time-consuming model retraining.


  • Specialized Knowledge Integration
    Organizations can incorporate their proprietary information and specialized knowledge bases into AI responses. For instance, integrating solutions from AI Automation in Finance: Revolutionizing Financial Services and Unlocking Innovation can optimize financial decision-making processes.


  • Enhanced Transparency
    RAG systems provide clear source citations, making responses more trustworthy and verifiable.


  • Cost-Effective Updates
    Maintaining and updating RAG systems requires fewer resources compared to retraining entire language models.


Real-World Applications



According to Signity Solutions, RAG is transforming various industries:



  • Healthcare
    Medical professionals are using RAG systems to access current research, improve diagnoses, and provide better patient care by integrating up-to-date medical information.


  • Legal Services
    Law firms are implementing RAG to assist lawyers with case research, providing relevant legal precedents and local law citations.


  • Customer Support
    Companies are enhancing their chatbots with RAG technology to provide more accurate, company-specific information to customers.


  • Research and Development
    Scientists and researchers are accelerating their work by using RAG systems for comprehensive literature reviews and hypothesis generation.


  • Content Creation
    As reported by Glean, journalists and content creators are utilizing RAG to efficiently access and verify facts and figures, improving the quality and accuracy of their work.


  • Financial Services
    Leveraging insights from AI in Banking and Finance: Revolutionizing the Financial Sector and AI Automation in Finance: Revolutionizing Financial Services and Unlocking Innovation, financial institutions are enhancing their AI-driven fraud detection and risk management capabilities.




While RAG represents a significant advancement, organizations must consider several important factors:



  1. Information Quality Control
    The system's effectiveness heavily depends on the quality and relevance of the retrieved information.


  2. Security Protocols
    When handling sensitive or proprietary information, robust security measures must be implemented.


  3. Technical Integration
    Organizations need to carefully plan the integration of RAG systems with their existing AI infrastructure. Insights from AI Automation in Finance can guide the seamless incorporation of automation tools.


Looking Ahead: The Future of RAG



As artificial intelligence continues to evolve, RAG stands as a testament to the industry's commitment to improving AI capabilities. Its ability to combine the power of generative AI with dynamic, context-specific information retrieval marks a significant step forward in making AI systems more reliable, accurate, and practical for real-world applications.



The technology's potential to enhance decision-making, improve information accuracy, and provide transparent AI solutions makes it an invaluable tool for organizations across various sectors. As we move forward, RAG's role in shaping the future of AI applications appears increasingly significant, promising more intelligent, trustworthy, and capable AI systems for tomorrow's challenges.



Frequently Asked Questions



What is Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG)?



RAG is an AI technique that enhances language models by incorporating external information retrieval, allowing them to access and utilize current, relevant data from various sources.



How does RAG improve AI accuracy?



By grounding responses in verified external sources, RAG reduces the risk of AI hallucinations and improves the accuracy and reliability of generated content.



What are the key components of a RAG system?



The key components include the Retriever, the Language Model, and the Vector Database, each playing a crucial role in information retrieval and response generation.



Which industries can benefit from RAG?



Industries such as healthcare, legal services, finance, customer support, research and development, and content creation can significantly benefit from implementing RAG systems.



What challenges should be considered when implementing RAG?



Organizations should consider information quality control, security protocols for sensitive data, and the technical integration with existing AI infrastructure.

}
Feb

AI-Powered PPT Generator

How I Built an AI That Turns Ideas into PowerPoint Slides

What if there is a product which can take your idea, do the research, find the relevant fact & figures and then use that data into nicely crafted PowerPoint presentation?
Almost everyone is using AI (LLMs) to do the research, however, while research has been automated, presentation is not and I personally find it significantly time consuming to create a PowerPoint presentation. So I applied my limited knowledge of AI-driven automation to see if this chore can be automated (90% I would aim for).

This question was the spark for Slider, a web application designed to do just that: turn a single search phrase into a fully-formed, downloadable PowerPoint presentation. This is the story of its development—a journey from a simple idea to a robust, resilient web service, fraught with subtle bugs, architectural pivots, and invaluable lessons in software engineering.

Chapter 1: The Spark of an Idea (The "Why")

The initial goal was ambitious but clear: create a tool that automates the entire presentation creation pipeline. A user should be able to provide a topic, say, "The Future of Renewable Energy," and in return, receive a ".pptx" file complete with a title slide, content slides with key points, and even data visualizations like charts and tables. The aim was to save hours of manual work and provide a solid, editable foundation that users could then refine.

Chapter 2: The Initial Architecture (The "How")

To bring this idea to life, I settled on a modern, decoupled architecture:

    • Frontend: A simple HTML form with a sprinkle of vanilla JavaScript.
    • Backend: A Python server using FastAPI.
    • The AI & Orchestration Layer: Leveraging n8n for workflow automation.
    • The Presentation Generator: python-pptx for building slides.

The n8n Workflow

    1. FastAPI calls an n8n webhook with the search phrase.
    2. n8n generates structured JSON (titles, bullets, mock chart data).
    3. JSON is passed back to FastAPI, which builds the presentation.

Chapter 3: First Blood - The "Division by Zero" Bug

Error creating presentation: float floor division by zero
Matplotlib choked when AI returned empty data for charts. Fix: validate chart data before rendering.

Chapter 4: The Silent Killer - The Timeout Issue

httpx default timeout (60s) killed long AI workflows. Fix:
async with httpx.AsyncClient(timeout=None) as client:
    response = await client.post(N8N_WEBHOOK_URL, json=webhook_payload)

Chapter 5: Improving the User Experience (The "Feel")

Fixing backend logic wasn’t enough—the real bottleneck was how it felt to users. An app that quietly sits there for minutes without feedback is indistinguishable from one that’s broken. I knew I had to design for perceived performance, not just raw speed. This led to the introduction of a dynamic loading system:
  • A spinner to visually confirm that the request was in progress.
  • Rotating status updates such as “Contacting AI assistant…”, “Generating slides…”, and “Almost done…”.
  • Clear error messages if something failed, so users weren’t left guessing.
This turned waiting into an interactive experience rather than a frustrating black hole. Users reported that even if it took a couple of minutes, they trusted the process because they could “see” progress happening. The takeaway: sometimes the difference between a tool that feels clunky and one that feels professional isn’t speed—it’s communication.

Chapter 6: The Devil in the Details – Fonts and Aesthetics

Once the system was stable, smaller issues came into focus—and they mattered more than I expected. Font issues: My Docker container didn’t include the Segoe UI font that PowerPoint defaults to. As a result, charts rendered with odd-looking fallback fonts, making them look unpolished. The fix was to install fonts and rebuild the font cache inside the container. Invisible text bug: Some slides came out with black text on dark backgrounds. This wasn’t a crash—it was worse, because users thought the tool worked, but the slides were unreadable. The workaround was a brute-force loop that:
  • Iterated through every shape on every slide.
  • Explicitly set the font color to white.
  • Enforced consistent readability across the deck.
This phase drove home the lesson that polish matters. The difference between a hacky prototype and a product people actually use often lies in those small, edge-case fixes that elevate the experience.
def is_valid_pptx(file_content: bytes) -> bool:
    if not file_content:
        return False
    try:
        file_stream = io.BytesIO(file_content)
        Presentation(file_stream)
        return True
    except Exception:
        return False

Conclusion: Lessons Learned and The Road Ahead

  • Defensive Programming: Validate all data.
  • Know Your Tools: Defaults matter (timeouts, libraries).
  • User Experience is Paramount: Feedback beats silence.
  • Build for Failure: Handle errors gracefully.
The road ahead for Slider is exciting—more layouts, authentication, maybe Google Slides integration. But the foundation is now strong, built not just on code, but on lessons from every bug squashed.
You can check out the source code for this project on GitHub. What features would you like to see next? Let me know in the comments!
Sep

AI in Banking and Finance: Revolutionizing the Financial Sector

Cover Image

AI in Banking and Finance: Revolutionizing the Financial Sector



Estimated reading time: 8 minutes



Key Takeaways



  • AI is revolutionizing the banking and finance sector by enhancing efficiency, customer experience, and security.


  • Integration of AI leads to improved operational efficiency through automation of routine tasks.


  • AI enhances fraud detection and risk management, safeguarding assets and reducing financial crime.


  • AI provides personalized banking services and improves customer satisfaction.


  • Challenges include data privacy, algorithmic bias, and regulatory compliance which need to be addressed.


Table of contents





Artificial Intelligence (AI) in banking and finance is revolutionizing the financial sector, driving innovation, and transforming customer experiences. As AI continues to advance rapidly, its impact on various industries becomes increasingly significant. AI, defined as the simulation of human intelligence processes by machines—particularly computer systems—includes learning, reasoning, and self-correction. This blog post aims to inform readers about how AI is transforming banking and finance and explore various use cases and future trends.



Overview of AI in the Financial Sector



Integration of AI in Banking and Finance



The integration of AI in banking and finance is on the rise as financial institutions adopt AI technologies to stay competitive. From enhanced customer interactions to operational efficiencies, AI offers numerous benefits.



Benefits of AI in the Financial Sector



  • Improved Operational Efficiency: Automating routine tasks with AI reduces operational costs and streamlines processes.


  • Enhanced Customer Service: AI provides personalized services and 24/7 support, significantly improving customer satisfaction.


  • Strengthened Security Measures: AI enhances fraud detection and risk management, safeguarding assets.


With the shift towards digital banking, powered by AI, financial services are becoming more accessible and efficient across the globe. Appinventiv



How AI is Transforming Financial Services



Enhanced Customer Experience



  • AI-Powered Chatbots: AI-driven chatbots and virtual assistants, like Bank of America's Erica, serve millions, offering personalized support and advice.


  • Faster Processes: AI accelerates loan approvals and account openings through automated systems. Appinventiv


Improved Operational Efficiency



  • Task Automation: AI automates tasks such as data entry and transaction processing.


  • Data Insights: AI-driven analysis provides better business insights and facilitates compliance reporting.


Advanced Fraud Detection



  • Real-Time Monitoring: AI monitors transactions to spot suspicious patterns.


  • Adaptive Algorithms: Machine learning algorithms evolve to combat new fraud techniques.


Risk Management



  • Accurate Credit Scoring: AI provides more precise credit scoring models.


  • Market Risk Assessment: AI predicts market risks and forecasts changes effectively.


Appinventiv



AI Use Cases in Banking



Automated Customer Support



Banks employ AI-powered chatbots to handle customer queries efficiently. Bank of America's Erica is a notable example. Benefits include round-the-clock availability and swift response times. Appinventiv



Personalized Banking Experiences



AI analyzes customer data to offer personalized product recommendations and financial advice. JPMorgan Chase utilizes AI for personalized investment guidance. Rackspace Technology



Predictive Analytics



AI forecasts customer behavior, market trends, and potential risks. For instance, Wells Fargo uses AI to predict customer loan defaults. The Alan Turing Institute



Machine Learning in Banking



Defining Machine Learning



Machine learning, a subset of AI, focuses on developing systems that can learn from data and make decisions.



Applications of Machine Learning



  • Credit Scoring: ML models assess creditworthiness, reducing default rates.


  • Risk Assessment: Banks leverage ML for evaluating market risks.


  • Market Predictions: ML algorithms forecast market trends for strategic investments.


AI-Driven Fraud Detection



Critical Role in Banking Security



AI plays a crucial role in enhancing fraud detection capabilities.



  • Real-Time Monitoring: Identifying unusual transaction patterns.


  • Machine Learning Models: Adapting to recognize new fraud techniques.


Mastercard's AI system has reduced false declines significantly, improving fraud detection. Star Knowledge



AI Risk Management in Finance



Transforming Risk Management



AI transforms credit, market, and operational risk management.



  • Credit Risk: Analyzing borrower risk with AI models.


  • Market Risk: Predicting volatility using AI algorithms.


  • Operational Risk: Identifying inefficiencies in internal processes.


Challenges



  • Data Quality Issues: Reliable data inputs are essential.


  • Model Interpretability: The challenge of interpreting AI decisions.


  • Regulatory Compliance: Navigating complex regulations.


Challenges and Ethical Considerations



Data Privacy and Security



Protecting sensitive financial data and complying with regulations like GDPR and CCPA is crucial.



Algorithmic Bias and Transparency



Addressing biases in AI decisions ensures fairness. Transparency in AI systems allows for better understanding and auditability.



Regulatory Compliance



Adapting to evolving regulations is vital for safe AI implementation in finance.



The Future of AI in Banking and Finance





  • Advanced Predictive Models: Enhanced risk assessment tools.


  • Hyper-Personalization: AI will offer even more personalized financial services.


  • Process Automation: Increased automation of administrative tasks is expected.


  • Integration with Emerging Technologies: AI's collaboration with blockchain and IoT will drive innovation.


Potential Impact



AI's transformative impact will redefine traditional banking models, leading to new financial products and services.



Preparing for the Future



Financial institutions should invest in AI research and talent to stay ahead. Adapting to technological advancements will be key to success.



Conclusion



Recap



AI is transforming banking and finance by improving customer experiences, enhancing efficiency, and securing transactions.



Final Thoughts



Embracing AI responsibly and balancing innovation with ethical practices is crucial. Navigating regulation ensures sustainable growth.



Call to Action



Stay informed about AI developments by engaging with industry news, webinars, and educational resources.



AI's role in banking and finance is a game-changer, promising innovation and improved services. Let's embrace AI with an ethical and informed approach to drive the future of financial services.



Frequently Asked Questions



Q1: How is AI enhancing customer experience in banking?

AI enhances customer experience by providing personalized services, AI-powered chatbots for 24/7 support, and faster processing times for transactions and services.



Q2: What are the challenges of implementing AI in finance?

Challenges include data privacy and security concerns, algorithmic bias, ensuring transparency, and navigating complex regulatory compliance.



Q3: How does AI help in fraud detection?

AI helps in fraud detection through real-time monitoring of transactions, identifying suspicious patterns, and adapting to new fraud techniques using machine learning algorithms.



Q4: What is the future of AI in banking and finance?

The future includes enhanced predictive models, hyper-personalization of services, increased automation, and integration with emerging technologies like blockchain and IoT.



Jan
Scroll to Top